Improving the environment is not something close to the hearts of many in Lebanon. One only has to look at the litter to be found in every street, the issues surrounding garbage disposal (or lack thereof) in the last 18 months and the air polution that is so obvious in the skies over Beirut when viewed from a distance.

Perhaps there is some hope, as this article from today's Daily Star, suggests: –

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2016/Oct-23/377765-thousands-participate-in-massive-litani-river-clean-up-effort.ashx?utm_medium=email&utm_source=transactional&utm_campaign=Newsletter

Continuing the saga of the election of a Lebanese president, The National has published the following article –

http://www.thenational.ae/world/middle-east/hariri-backs-foe-aoun-for-lebanese-presidency

Debate is now intense; will Hariri's endorsement lead to the election when the next scheduled vote takes place on 31 October? Rumors say that Saudi Arabia is unhappy with Hariri's action, but it is hard to believe that he would have done it without clearing it with Riyadh. Many of his fellow Sunni MPs are very unhappy and could well cast blank votes or vote against Aoun; Amal Movement leader and Parliament Speaker, Nabih Berri is also very unhappy has has vowed not to vote for Aoun, but has told the candidate that he will not deny the voting session a quorum; Druze leader Walid Jumblat is meeting his 11 members of parliament today to discuss the matter. This group, sometimes referred to as “kingmakers” could decide the matter; John Kerry, while welcoming the initiative, has doubts that it will lead the election of a president; What will be the attitude of Aoun's long time ally Hizbollah?

Watch this space for continuing comments.

I am back after a very long time, but from now on expect regular postings in this Blog.

Lebanon has been without a president since May 2014, when the term of Michel Suleiman expired. Since then parliament, which elects the president in Lebanon has failed to elect a successor in spite of over 40 attempts. Sessions called by the Speaker for the purpose of a presidential election have never been quorate because of a boycott by the supporters of Michel Aoun. Yesterday the following article was published, speculating on the possibility of Saad Hariri endorsing Aoun in attempt to end the stalemate.

http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/comment/hizbollah-blocks-the-long-search-for-a-president

A few hours later Hariri did indeed announce his support for the election of Aoun and now all thoughts are centered on what will happen on 31 October, when the next session of parliament has been called for the purpose of electing a president. Aoun's success is by no means certain – there is still another candidate in the running – Suleiman Franjieh – and there are many who oppose Aoun.

Back after a long time.

Lebanon at last has a new government, after nearly six months of haggling over who gets which ministry. It is no surprise that the composition of the new cabinet is markedly pro-Syrian and contains a majority of members who support Hizbullah. It is the first time for a long time that the country has a government which does not attempt to be one of “National Unity”, embracing all parts of the political spectrum, and this may mean that it can take decisions – maybe even controversial ones! The new opposition has vowed to do everything possible to bring down the government, but given that it has the support of a majority of members of parliament, it is difficult to see how this could be achieved by constitutional means, unless Mr Jumblat changes sides again.

There is much for the government to do, if only to clear the backlog of issues that have accumulated since the previous government was ousted in January. Top of the list is the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), set up by the UN in 2007 to investigate the 2005 assassination of Rafic Hariri and prosecute those responsible. It is difficult to believe that it is a coincidence that the STL's first indictments, said to name 4 Hizbullah members, were delivered to the Minister of Justice while the cabinet was discussing the clause in its policy statement concering its position on the STL. Much publicity was given to the names said to be in the indictment, which were leaked to the media with remarkable speed. Hizbullah, naturally, denies that those indicted were involved and says that there is no way that they will ever be handed over to the court by Lebanon. This, in any case, is academic, as those named almost certainly left Lebanon long ago for Syria and/or Iran.

Well, yesterday the Lebanese parliament gave an overwhelming vote of confidence in the national unity government formed by Fouad Siniora, despite reservations expressed by some of the 60 members who spoke and sometimes heated debate between members of different political persuasions. So now the second stage of the process agreed in Doha has been accomplished. The president was elected and the national unity government has been established. The next task is amending the electoral law in time to hold parliamentary elections in May 2009. Although general agreement on the necessary reforms was achieved in Doha, there is undoubtedly room for different interpretations on what has to be done and how to achieve it!

Otherwise, no-one expects much from what is a government with a limited life – 9 month maximum. It is very unlikely, given the opposition veto powers in cabinet, that anything controversial will be proposed, let alone decided. Matters such as privatisation or an increase in the VAT rate, which were among the commitments given at the Paris III conference, are unlikely to see the light of day.

And what does the rest of the world make of the ministerial statement to which parliament gave its approval. Typical of the headlines in the western media were “Lebanon to pass law legitimising Hezbollah attacks on Israel”. Inaccurate, but not so far from the truth. Undoubtedly Israel is unhappy with developments, and has made it clear that it will regard any attack by Hezbollah as sanctioned by the Lebanese government and as a result may retaliate against any target in the country. This would differ from its attitude in the 2006 war, which was clearly against Hezbollah rather that the country, although this did not prevent the death of some 1200 civilians and substantial damage to infrastructure.

Today the president starts an official visit to Damascus, where it is expected that there will be agreement on establishing diplomatic relations between Lebanon and Syria and the exchange of ambassadors. There are many other matters on the agenda and expectations of progress on some of them, notwithsnding the parliamentary majority's reservations.

I have been somewhat negligent lately – nothing posted since 28 May, the day that the new president was elected. Now, today, more than seven weeks after the Doha Agreement was signed, we finally have the promised National Unity Government formed. Having seen the bickering and bargaining that has gone on for the last 30 days I cannot see how it is ever going to manage to achieve anything – personally I do not expect anything controversial to be discussed, much less there to be any agreement and action on such issues. The best that we can hope for is a period of calm and, perhaps, the passing into law of the new electoral law, the general terms of which were agreed in Doha. As usual, we shall see!

Following is a list of ministers making up Lebanon's new cabinet:

• Prime Minister: Fouad Saniora
• Finance Ministry: Mohammed Shatah
• Justice Ministry: Ibarahim Najjar
• Social Affairs Ministry: Mario Aoun
• Industry Ministry:Ghazi Zoaiter
• Tourism Ministry: Elie Marouni
• Culture Ministry: Tamam Salam
• Environment Ministry: Tony Karam
• Deputy Prime Minister : Issam abou Jamra
• Defense Ministry: Elias Murr
• Ministers of State: Wael Abou Faour, Nassib Lahoud, Jean Ogassapian, Ali Qanso, Khaled Qabani
• Refugees Ministry: Raymond Audi
• Administrative Reforms Ministry: Ibrahim Shamseddine
• Economy and Trade Ministry: Mohammed Safadi
• Interior and Municipalities Ministry: Ziad Baroud
• Youth and Sport: Talal Arslan
• Education Ministry: Bahia Hariri
• Transport and Public Buildings Ministry: Ghazi Aridi
• Foreign Affairs Ministry: Fawzi Salloukh
• Energy and Water Ministry: Alain Taborian
• Labor Ministry: Mohammed Fneish
• Health Ministry: Mohammed Jawad Khalife
• Agriculture Ministry: Elie Skaff
• Telecommunications Ministry: Gebran Bassil
• Information Ministry: Tareq Mitri

Now the president can leave for the Euro-Med conference in Paris tomorrow – he had been threatening not to attend if the government was not formed before he was due to leave. It might prove an interesting meeting, the attendees including Israeli Prime Minister Olmert and Turkish Prime Minister Ergodan. The latter is actively involved in indirect negotiations between Syria and Israel and Israel has indicated that it would like to bring Lebanon into the peace discussions. Of course, the biggest problem with regard to Israeli-Lebanon peace is the fate of the approximately 400,000 Palestinian refugees in the country. Most of these are 1948 refugees or their descendants and no one seriously expects that they are going to return to their homes in what is now and will remain the State of Israel. Equally, their permanent settlement and naturalisation in Lebanon is fraught with issues; since most are Sunni Muslims the fragile sectarian balance would be seriously changed and, publicly at least, no politician is prepared to accept this.

My comment earlier today about the presence of the Turkish prime minister at the election of the new Lebanese president last Sunday may well have been right. Today the Syrian president met a visiting UK parliamentary delegation in Damascus and referred to the possibility of Lebanese/Israeli peace talks. It looks as though Syria is preparing to dump Hizbullah, but if this happens how will Hizbullah react and what will be the attitude of Iran? Watch this space

One week after the successful conclusion of the talks in Doha, Lebanon has a new president – the consensus candidate Michel Suleiman – and the parliamentary majority has nominated outgoing Prime Minister, Fouad Sinioura, as their choice to form the next government. Now begins the process of forming the new 30 member cabinet, in which the majority will nominate 16 members, the Hizbullah led opposition 11 and the president 3. No doubt there will be a lot of negotiating and who gets which ministry, but the process, lead by the new president, is expected to be completed fairly quickly.

What does all this mean for Lebanon and the region? The election and swearing-in of the new president on Sunday evening was attended by, among others, the foreign ministers of Syria and Iran (who sat side by side), the Saudi, French and Italian foreign ministers and, of course the Ruler of Qatar and his prime minister, through whose efforts the compromise was reached. Also present was a US Congressional delegation of 6 people, and another, somewhat strange, attendee was the Turkish prime minister. We must remember, however, that Israel and Syria are at present conducting peace talks under Turkish auspices; could it be that Mr Erdogan was testing the waters on the possibility of bringing Lebanon into the peace talks?

It is impossible that the deal done in Doha could have materialised without the agreement of Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Undoubtably, all were concerned that the events in Lebanon could develop into a wider Sunni-Shia conflict in the Middle East, something which, it seems, none of them wants at this time.

If the Syrian/Israeli talks produce results it will be a blow for Hizbullah and Iran, but can only benefit Lebanon. Little is likely to happen until a change of Administration in Washington and we must hope and pray that Mr Bush does not decide to embark on any more ill-advised ventures in the region during his last months in office.

The Lebanese political leadership has stepped back from the abyss and concluded a deal in Doha in the early hours of this morning. Everyone agrees that no one got everything they were demanding but an undoubted winner is the Hizbullah led opposition who have been allocated 11 members in a 30 member cabinet, which will give them veto powers over major decisions. It remains to be seen how this may affect the international tribunal being established to try the suspects in the assassination of Rafiq Hariri. The present government agreed to the establishment of the tribunal after the opposition members withdrew from the cabinet in December 2006, and the opposition attitude has always been that cabinet decisions since the withdrawal are invalid. On the other hand, and undoubted looses is the United States, which has expressed unswerving support for the government of Fouad Siniora. Although Condolesa Rice has expressed satisfaction that the agreement has been concluded and further inter-communal fighting stopped, she cannot be very happy with the increased influence of Hizbullah in government.

During today the opposition tented camp in downtown Beirut is being dismantled and Hizbullah say this will be completed by midnight. The Speaker has called parliament into session for Sunday to elect the consensus candidate, commander of the army Michel Suleiman, as the next president. No one has mentioned for many months that there is a need to amend the constitution before he can legally take up the office – it provides that any senior government employee, which includes army officers, cannot run for the presidency until at least two years have elapsed since their resignation or retirement from government service. Maybe the constitution will also be amended on Sunday.

There seems to be a mixture of relief and indifference among Lebanese at the results of the Doha agreement. Many are not convinced that it is a long term solution to Lebanon's many political problems but for the immediate future calm and normality (whatever that means in Lebanon) may prevail. Perhaps there is hope to salvage something of the summer tourist season and revive the moribund businesses in the downtown area of Beirut.

The events of the last 10 days have resulted in a new situation in the country. Hizbullah has used its weapons against Lebanese – something it said it would never do – and proved that its military strength could enable it to take over the country if it wished, the Government was forced to back down on two controversial decisions which Hizbullah considered to be a declaration of war against them and the army came close to splitting along sectarian lines. Walid Jumblat, leader of the Druze community, whose press conference in which he “revealed” what everyone knew already about the Hizbullah communications network and the security staff at Beirut airport, seemed shocked by the results of his outburst, as did all the political leadership, not to mention the entire population of the country.

Enter, again, the Arab League. Its Secretary General, Amr Moussa, has been shuttling to and from Beirut for months in an attempt to negotiate a solution to the political deadlock, but to no avail. However, a Foreign Ministers' meeting in Cairo last Sunday decided to appoint a ministerial committee, headed by the Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al Thani. In 24 hours he achieved what no one else had been able to do – obtained an agreement on an immediate return to the status quo ante and pursuaded the political leaders to acompany him back to Doha for negotiations on the core issues – the election of a president, the formation of a national unity government and a new electoral law.

One major issue that does not seem to be on the agenda for the Doha talks is the international tribunal to try the alledged assassins of former prime minister, Rafic Hariri. This may well be another stumbling block along the way, but, for now, the outlook is brighter than it was a week ago.

Beirut airport re-opened last night and the port resumed work this morning. The main border crossing into Syria has also reopened and business is getting back to normal. Let us hope that the Doha talks yield real results.